Blog of mine and other stuff

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Coming back to life

Hi all

I’ve been away for a long while. It was kinda unexpected – I just planned a little trip with to Paris, but now I have 2 major shifts in my life:

1. I’m changing jobs
2. I’m getting married!

It is so cool, that I can’t explain it all. I’m just overwhelmed by this, so I will get back to this blog, but it will take another couple of weeks to get my head straight and to get re-synced with everything.

So, have a great day y’all.
-A

August 16, 2007 Posted by | gentoo, job, life, linux, people | 1 Comment

Windows joke

July 2, 2007 Posted by | fun, gentoo, joke, linux, windows | 1 Comment

Google OS

Dear reader

I have shared with you my views on technology, operating systems and computing for awhile now. So here’s my latest one.

I just read a column by Matt Hartley (a contributing writer to OS Weekly). The article discusses possible entrance by Google into OS space.

I wanted to respond on that opinion by my own. The issue of Google OS is being debated for as long as Google become an important part of internet culture. Many have predicted the appearance of Google’s OS long time ago, but the thing never happened.

Why?

If Google OS is easy to create (just peak any Linux distro and create an additional “brand”), easy to maintain (the distro is already there and if you choose wisely, it is being frequently updated and bugfixed), easy to customize (it is Google after all using an open source application and it is a house full of open source developers), so why haven’t this already happened?

Because Google doesn’t need one. Just think about it. What Google’s purpose is? World domination. What Google’s business is? Selling ads. So how would OS integrate into this scheme?

Well, the thing is – it wouldn’t. And the main reason for this is that an importance of any specific operating system is diminishing by the second as much of our computer life goes onto the net. In addition, diversity of mobile and small devices running uncommon local operating systems would render another desktop OS useless – and those devices are great for Google, as they allow users to view ads anywhere. And another reason – is the one I’m putting always as reason du jour for many Windows users stay in Windows – gamers would not use it because they won’t have their favorite games there.

But besides any other reason, here’s the million dollar question: why Google needs to have an operating system if it is not in operating system business?

And what’s for sure, is that Ubuntu (Canonical) is very good by their own, without Google’s money. And if you target only home users, I’m sure you will fail, as main OS business today is actually business users.

I prefer Google contributing money to a good cause instead.

-A.

Technorati : , ,

July 1, 2007 Posted by | desktop, distro, gentoo, Google, linux, technology | 5 Comments

Innovation is total crap

Dear reader. I want you to know, that I intend to piss of a lot of folk by writing this, but this is intentional. I have nothing personal against you. I just want to say things that bug my mind.

I’m saying that innovation is total crap. It exist in extreme cases only.

Hear me up dear reader. Let me tell you about myself first, so you know why I think so:
I’ve started using a computer when I was at age seven or eight years old. It was a 16K memory Soviet computer, which was connected to my home TV with an analog cable with zillion connectors. It was connected to a tape, which produced funny voices like the TX terminator in T3 when she connected to a police computer.
That was the time when I’ve understood that my life is going to be around the computers and technology. I was much more interested with practical use than details of electronics.

Fast forward 20 and so years later. We now use computers with 16G memory (which is a factor of million). I have a cellphone which is much more powerful than my first computer. So, will someone tell me which innovation lead to this? How have we become so obsessed with this weird word “innovation”?

I find, that the use of this word is so ubiquitous, that it is used everywhere all the time. New software product? Innovative. New service? Innovative. New technique? Innovative.

Total crap.

If I went and created a teleported, someone would call it innovative. Others would say, “Teleporter? Come on, those Sci-Fi writers have said that for more than 50 years! I’ve seen Capt. Kirk using one!”.

I’m sorry dear reader if I hurt your feelings. You know what? Everything is innovative these days. New color for default theme? Innovative (5 years ago we’ve called it themes or skins). New window borders? Innovative (well, 10 years ago Windows were innovative, so what? 10 years until new innovation?). New sounds in the system? Innovative (well, we had 16bit sounds ages ago, haven’t we? Now its polyphonic and in stereo!).

So what is innovative after all? Let me tell you. It is what you like. My dad, who brought me that first computer of mine, thinks blog is innovative. My mom barely knows how to use a wordprocessor. You can call them obsolete – I call them my parents and my usability tester. Whichever they call “hard” – I believe it is hard, and keep working on it. Innovation is like a breath of fresh air. If this air smells like a bad fish, it’s not an innovation.

I’m sorry to bring it up, but no one innovates in business. Well, maybe they do, but I rarely find anything new these days.

There are out-standers. Let’s call them incremental innovators – they are improving the existing stuff, and their “fresh” versions appear so cool to us – it like that fresh air I was talking about. An ipod was like that.

So I’d call all the vendors of the world (including those of Open Source base) to stop shouting yet another buzz word. I’m seek of it. I’m tired. I can’t bare it any longer. I call your innovation “crap” until proven otherwise. Can you prove me you innovated? Can I be sure I won’t find your “innovation” anywhere else (like Microsoft’s “the world’s first no-ball mouse” which appeared in 2000’s, while we had an optical SUN mouse in our old unused and dusty pile of crap since, like 1994)?

Let me decide on your innovation. I can speak for myself you know.

One more thing for business oriented out there: I’ve never seen “innovation” as the major sales point.

“Hey boss, I’ve chosen that vendor because he’s so more innovative that 5 others we have considered! Yes, he’s pricey, but he’s so innovative!”.

This crap would make me laugh. This crap would’ve caused someone to lose a job.

That is all, dear reader.

Just my opinion. You can have your own.

Feedback is appreciated.

Technorati : , , ,

June 23, 2007 Posted by | gentoo, IBM, linux, microsoft, technology, Ubuntu | 2 Comments

Thoughts on widgets

I just read a blog post by Leah Culver about why widgets suck.

I’ve invested my few minutes of though on this. Result is here.

Feedback is appreciated.
-A

June 21, 2007 Posted by | gentoo, linux, Mac OS X, Ubuntu, widgets, windows | Leave a comment

Google Killing Microsoft?

I just read a digg story, titled “The Google Product That Could Kill Microsoft”. It mainly says this:

Office isn’t the only Microsoft hegemony that Google Gears could help destroy. One of the defining differences between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux is the application lineup. That’s given the crew in Redmond, Wash., tremendous power. But
technologies like Gears render the operating system irrelevant.

My first response was this.

So, here I am, thinking about it bit more. I will go over this in a little more detail:

  1. Google will “kill” Microsoft.
    While not really arguing with this argument, I’m not that sure what “killing” Microsoft means. There were aplenty cases in the history, when something buried by others is still pretty much alive. For such a huge entity as Microsoft, not only from software point of view, but economically – I’m not sure anyone can explain how can it “die”. I’m not saying that disappearance of Microsoft is not possible – it is. But Microsoft has so huge impact on technological way of life in our world, and especially on world’s economy (Microsoft’s software, hardware, platforms, intellectual property – and I mean in its pure logical sense of inventions, its financial base) – that I believe its almost a stand-alone machine which needs no human interaction to function. Too much effort and resources are put in it. So much, that its “death” seems to be possible only as a result of sudden unexpected surprise (like aliens invasion). So, yes, Microsoft will (I’m sure of it) loose its hold on a desktop and in business. But that doesn’t mean it will die. It will shift its act into other areas, and as any other meta-organism it will keep fighting for its life. So, Microsoft’s death? Not visible on my radar.
  2. Google applications
    Yes, Google has a lots of useful applications. I use Gmail and Google Reader myself. Even documents sometimes. But it really scares me that I might use everything online. While this may not be a security issue (say I’m keeping my sensitive information with me all the time), but in a Big Brother kind of thinking. Trusting Google with all the things I do online? To be able to track each and every step I do? To be able to say at any moment with high success probability what my internet usage patterns are? That’s scares the hell out of me. So I’d use Google apps, even in offline mode, but I do want a control over my computing needs. Paranoia, anyone?
    Now, while the argument here is being online and that the importance of operating systems installed locally is diminishing (which I’ve been saying for a long time). I agree to this statement, but why would anyone mentally healthy think that Microsoft would do nothing about it? (But that I suggest that Microsoft will also develop a platform for online applications).
  3. Online service
    That is the most unwise argument in whole the story. If being offline is that matters, why would Google beat Microsoft? Because sometimes I will be without the net access and still be able to do my work? Then why would I need Google for that? I still have my OS (be that Windows, Linux or Mac), and I don’t really have to use Google, right? So here I see 3 possible choices:
    • Google develops offline tools for their applications, allowing offline work. Microsoft get caught unprepared and dies off.
    • Microsoft develops online tools for many of their “offline” applications. Google get caught unprepared. Nothing happens to it.
    • Both Google and Microsoft provide online as well as offline applications, and competition is going on for the benefit of all customers.

    Which one seems more probable? I leave it for you to decide.

    Besides, in a few years the whole world will be online anyways anytime. Offline? Say what?

  4. All the other stuff
    As I’ve already said, there are so many areas where Google and Microsoft do not even compete, at least not yet. And these are pretty hefty areas with much money in them. How would Microsoft be killed by Google again?

In other words – Google killing Microsoft?
Maybe, but I’m not holding my breath yet.

-A.

Technorati : , , , ,

June 19, 2007 Posted by | gentoo, Google, linux, microsoft, Ubuntu | 2 Comments

Google Linux

I just read a column in Inquirer about meetup in Googleplex. There are people from Linux Foundation and FSF, which meet up in goal to discuss the latest Microsoft ramblings about licensing problems in Linux:

Following Microsoft’s inking of agreements with Linux hawkers, offering to shield them from lawsuits over the 235 patents it reckons versions of Linux infringe, a gathering of open sorcerers is assembling at Google HQ to debate what is to be done.

According to Reuters report, which helpfully details what a Linux geek is wearing these days (T-shirts and jeans), organizer of the “Collaboration Summit”, Jim Zemlin of the Linux Foundation, told the amassed geeks: “Guys: Be seekers of truth, not finders of contradiction.”

Maybe something will come of it, but typically, like the Left in politics, there may be too much squabbling over what society should look like after the revolution that the revolution will be eternally postponed.

I actually agree to this. Its much easier to discuss than get things done. But then, I like this comment:

Google Linux anyone?

Funny isn’t it? Not that Google needs such a thing, but I think that while everyone is talking Ubuntu would do the trick and take it all.

-A

Technorati : , ,

June 17, 2007 Posted by | computer, debian, desktop, distro, Fedora, gentoo, linux, novell, policy, politics, social, technology, Ubuntu | Leave a comment

Hottest female podcasters

Well, it had to come here at some point.

Take a look here. Who’s your favorite? 🙂

I think I’ll go for Amanda (although Cali and Amber are very hot as well)….

-A

June 14, 2007 Posted by | gentoo, linux, podcast, technology | 1 Comment

Spice up Windows – replace it! [with Linux]; part 5

In my few previous posts I’ve stated that I’d like to help people to spice their system and move from Windows to Linux. But we all know that it cannot be done in an instant. I started to explain the process in last posts. I hope that to this point you got used to those applications I’ve suggested before. If not, just have another week or two using them, until you’re comfortable enough with them.

This time I will explain the 5th step: Playing around

Note: suggestions in this post should be taken with care as I assume that you’ve read all previous parts and have a little experience with your new shiny system.

This step will include checking different environments, customizations and applications.

So, after you installed Linux, and your applications are working fine, what’s in it for you? What could you gain by all the effort of moving? Well, at least you’ve gained the following:

  • Moving to Linux made your system more stable. While Windows was probably stable enough for you, statistically there’s less loss of information on Linux systems I’ve worked with compared to Windows ones.
  • Your system is much more customizable now. Not that you should run and change anything, but you could’ve if you wanted to.
  • You didn’t have to pay a dime to Microsoft for a new version of Windows, to hardware store for a new hardware and yet still you have much better performing system. And the main catch? Its totally legal and free.

So, here are those things which can spice up your system even more:

1. Graphical environment – there’s a plenty of environments for Linux, which contrary to Windows, provide all sorts of features. All the odds are that if you went with my suggestions in previous posts, you’re using either KDE or Gnome. Head over to their sites and read about them! You can customize a look and functionality of those 2 in many unimaginable for Windows XP user ways.

2. Multimedia Library applications – I’ve suggested to use VLC, but that was just for convenience. There are so many multimedia applications for Linux, take a look:

And there are plenty more! I suggest you to look at them, play and choose what works best for you.

3. Photo Management application – I strongly suggest trying out F-Spot. It is great application for managing your photos!

And most important part is, of course – play around and have fun!

Feedback is greatly appreciated.

Technorati : , , , , ,

June 12, 2007 Posted by | arguments, browser, computer, gentoo, linux, microsoft, OS, technology, Ubuntu | 3 Comments

Spice up Windows – replace it! [with Linux]; part 4

In my few previous posts I’ve stated that I’d like to help people to spice their system and move from Windows to Linux. But we all know that it cannot be done in an instant. I started to explain the process in last posts. I hope that to this point you got used to those applications I’ve suggested before. If not, just have another week or two using them, until you’re comfortable enough with them.

This time I will explain the 4th step: Spicing up Windows!

This would include the following:

  • Backing up all you useful data (such as movies, music, family photos and those other photos).
  • Choosing Linux distribution.
  • Installing Linux distribution.
  • Back to work.

NOTE: this step will be much easier if some member of your family (or a friend) who actually familiar with computers will be around helping. He or she can save a great deal of time, effort and negative emotions by helping to do all this.

Here we go:

1. In first step, you should definitely back up your stuff. Stuff includes documents, music, video, photos and all sorts of other things we always forget about (such as contacts, bookmarks and other settings which just the way we work – not the real information). I can’t say where is this stuff of yours on your computer (except maybe Firefox bookmarks), but computer-literate people can always locate it pretty fast for ya. That’s where that nephew of yours becomes handy and should repay for all those candy you’ve invested in him. You do get candies, toy cars and soldiers for him, right?

2. Choosing the distribution. Oh boy, this is so interesting step. By browsing multitudes of sites, you can find that there are several hundreds(!) distributions in the existence, while one or two more are created each day. So how should you choose? Well, the fact is (and I’m sure many disagree), it doesn’t matter! There are only 2 major differences between them all:

  • They use different package manager (package is like installation file for a program)
  • They have different set of chosen defaults for applications, settings and environments.

So, anyway, how should you choose? I suggest the following:

  1. Choose the one that can easily be installed.
  2. Use it for a while
  3. Either stay with it if it fulfills your need, or try another.

I’m going to recommend using one of the following for beginners:

As I’ve never used anything remotely as much as I have used Gentoo Linux (not recommended for beginners, but it is the one I use on my systems), I won’t suggest anything else. I hope that commenters will suggest other distributions and I will update the post 🙂

Another suggestion, is to use Wubi project, which intends to make the installation of Ubuntu Linux much easier for Windows users. (this one thanks to an anonymous commenter on my blog).

3. After (or during) installing Linux, make sure that all the applications I suggested before are installed. Just to make it quick reminder, here’s the list:

  • Firefox
  • Thunderbird
  • Pidgin
  • Xchat
  • eMule
  • Azureus
  • Skype
  • Gizmo Project
  • VLC Player
  • Picasa
  • Jajuk
  • Songbird
  • Open Office
  • AbiWord
  • GnuCash
  • Grisibi

So now, what you’re left to do is transfer you stuff to a new shiny Linux computer and get back to work. Using the same application will (supposedly) have no effect whatsoever on your productivity or entertainment.

I hope that these instructions cover the basics. If it doesn’t, let me know and I will help you find information you need.

Next time I will explain when will you feel the change and what can be done with it.

Have fun!

Feedback is greatly appreciated.

-A.

Technorati : , , , , ,

June 10, 2007 Posted by | arguments, browser, computer, gentoo, linux, microsoft, OS, technology, Ubuntu | 2 Comments

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started